June 2025

May 2025

April 2025

March 2025

February 2025

January 2025

Idiocracy, A Film Review

Idiocracy, a movie review 

Movie Review: “Idiocracy” as a Prophetic Satire of Our Times – With a Side of President Camacho Meets Donald Trump

When Mike Judge released Idiocracy in 2006, it was largely dismissed as a goofy dystopian comedy. But almost two decades later, it’s difficult to watch the film without a sense of foreboding. What once seemed a grotesque exaggeration now feels eerily plausible, even prophetic. Its portrayal of anti-intellectualism, environmental collapse, and entertainment-obsessed culture rings more true today with the meteoric rise of social media. And most jarringly, the character of President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho—half-wrestler, half-showman, full-blown caricature—seems like a clear premonition of Donald Trump’s administration. 

The premise of Idiocracy is simple but plausible: average man Joe Bauers (Luke Wilson) is chosen for a military hibernation experiment. Bureaucracy breaks down and frozen Joe is lost for 500 years. Well, maybe that’s not plausible. Funny as hell though.  Joe awakens in a world where intelligence has regressed to the point of societal collapse. The premise hinges on the idea that smart people stopped reproducing while the least intelligent did so prolifically, leading to a genetically dumbed-down populace. In reality social media is doing that to the culture every second of every day. The real punch isn’t in the genetics—it’s in the culture. Language has devolved into grunts and catchphrases. You can see this trend on TikTok. Care for the environment has also collapsed but not from negligence. From stupidity. Crops are watered with a Gatorade-like sports drink called Brawndo (because “it has electrolytes”), and society is ruled by spectacle over reason or science by corporations that only cater to the base desires of humanity, food and sex. 

This is where President Camacho comes in. Played by Terry Crews, Camacho is a former porn star and five-time wrestling champion who governs with chest-thumping bluster, machine guns, and showbiz flair. His speeches are raucous rallies filled with fireworks, flexing, and threats. Very similar to a MAGA rally. He offers simplistic, feel-good solutions to complex problems, surrounds himself with sycophants, and turns governance into performance. When the country faces a food crisis, Camacho doesn’t consult scientists—he consults Joe, now the smartest man alive. This is just dead on for seeing Elon Musk enter the MAGA political spotlight. 

Watching Camacho in action, it’s impossible not to see parallels with Donald Trump’s presidency. Trump, a reality TV star and branding tycoon, brought a similar circus energy to American politics. Like Camacho, Trump’s rise was fueled by celebrity culture, mass media, and the disdain of traditional expertise. Both figures speak a populist language of emotional appeals and macho bravado, pitting themselves as anti-elitist saviors of the common man. They cultivate adoring fanbases who value loyalty over logic and spectacle over substance.

In Trump’s 2016 campaign and subsequent presidency, rallies often resembled WWE events more than political gatherings. He insulted opponents with childish nicknames, encouraged violence against dissenters, and governed via Twitter with the impulsiveness of a teenager. MAGA has obliterated the norms of decorum, diplomacy, and deliberation in order to bring us entertainment and chaos. In one infamous moment, Trump held up a Sharpie-altered hurricane map to support a false claim he made—an idiotic gesture that wouldn’t be out of place in Idiocracy’s fever dream of a White House.

And just as in Idiocracy, where citizens blindly believe advertising slogans (“Brawndo’s got what plants crave!”), Trump’s supporters often echoed catchphrases divorced from facts—“Build the wall,” “Drain the swamp,” “Stop the steal.” Like Camacho, Trump weaponized distrust in science, the media, and intellectualism. The climate crisis was dismissed as a hoax; pandemic guidance was mocked; experts were replaced with loyalists. We didn’t need 500 years to fall into the trap Idiocracy warned us about—it took less than two decades.

Still, the film’s value isn’t just in its predictive accuracy, but in the sharpness of its cultural critique. It doesn’t hate the “stupid people” as much as it despairs at the systems that reward laziness, commodify ignorance, and replace civic discourse with memes. It’s a takedown of consumer capitalism, infotainment, and the erosion of public education—all forces that paved the way for both Camacho and Trump.

What saves Idiocracy from total nihilism is its protagonist. Joe, an unremarkable man of average intelligence, doesn’t become a hero through brilliance, but by applying basic logic and common decency. That message feels more urgent now than ever: it doesn’t take a genius to make the world better, just someone willing to think critically and act responsibly.

In hindsight, Idiocracy wasn’t a comedy—it was a warning. One that we’ve largely ignored. President Camacho, once an outlandish spoof, now looks like a cautionary mirror. In the Trump era—and perhaps beyond—we are forced to ask: were we watching satire, or prophecy?

Either way, Idiocracy remains required viewing. Not just to laugh, but to recognize how thin the line is between parody and policy—and to wonder whether the future is still salvageable, or if we’ve already arrived.